代数(英文版)(独家销售)
基本信息
- 原书名:Algebra
- 原出版社: Prentice Hall/Pearson
- 作者: (美)Michael Artin [作译者介绍]
- 丛书名: 经典原版书库
- 出版社:机械工业出版社
- ISBN:7111139135
- 上架时间:2004-3-11
- 出版日期:2004 年3月
- 开本:16开
- 页码:618
- 版次:1-1
- 所属分类:
数学 > 代数,数论及组合理论 > 综合
教材 > 研究生/本科/专科教材 > 理学 > 数学
编辑推荐
著名代数学家与代数几何学家Michael Artin所著,在麻省理工学院、普林斯顿大学、哥伦比亚大学等著名学府得到了广泛采用,是代数学的经典教材之一。
推荐阅读
内容简介回到顶部↑
本书由著名代数学家与代数几何学家Michael Artin所著,是作者在代数领域数十年的智慧和经验的结晶。书中既介绍了矩阵运算、群、向量空间、线性变换、对称等较为基本的内容,又介绍了环、模型、域,伽罗瓦理论等较为高深的内容,本书对于提高数学理解能力。增强对代数的兴趣是非常有益处的。此外,本书的可阅读性强,书中的习题也很有针对性,能让读者很快地掌握分析和思考的方法。
本书在麻省理工学院、普林斯顿大学、哥伦比亚大学等著名学府得到了广泛采用,是代数学的经典教材之一。
本书在麻省理工学院、普林斯顿大学、哥伦比亚大学等著名学府得到了广泛采用,是代数学的经典教材之一。
作译者回到顶部↑
本书提供作译者介绍
Michael Artin当代领袖型代数学家与代数几何学家之一,美国麻省理工学院的应用数学教授。由子他在交换代数与非交换代数。环论以及现代代数几何学等方面做出的贡献,2002年获得美国数学学会颁发的Leroy P.Steele终身成就奖。Artin的主要贡献包括他的逼近定理、在解决沙法列维奇-泰特猜测中的工作以及为推广“概形”而创建的“代数空间”概念。 除本书以外,Artin所著(或与人合著)的书还有《Etale Homotopy》,《Arithmetic》。《Arithmetic Geometry》、《Contributions to Algebraic Geometry in Hono.. << 查看详细
目录回到顶部↑
preface
a note for the teacher
chapter i matrix operations
1. the basic operations 1
2. row reduction 9
3. determinants 18
4. permutation matrices 24
5. cramer's rule 28
exercises 31
chapter 2 groups
1. the definition of a group 38
2. subgroups 44
3. isomorphisms 48
4. homomorphisms 51
$. equivalence relations and partitions 53
6. cosets 57
7. restriction of a homomorphism to a subgroup 59
8. products of groups 61
9. modular arithmetic 64
10. quotient groups 66
a note for the teacher
chapter i matrix operations
1. the basic operations 1
2. row reduction 9
3. determinants 18
4. permutation matrices 24
5. cramer's rule 28
exercises 31
chapter 2 groups
1. the definition of a group 38
2. subgroups 44
3. isomorphisms 48
4. homomorphisms 51
$. equivalence relations and partitions 53
6. cosets 57
7. restriction of a homomorphism to a subgroup 59
8. products of groups 61
9. modular arithmetic 64
10. quotient groups 66
前言回到顶部↑
Important though the general concepts and propositions may be with which the modern and industrious passion for axiomatizing and generalizing has presented us, in algebra perhaps more than anywhere else, nevertheless I am convinced that the special problems in all their complexity constitute the stock and core of mathematics, and that to master their difficulties requires
on the whole the harder labor.
Herman Weyl
This book began about 20 years ago in the form of supplementary notes for my algebra classes. I wanted to discuss some concrete topics such as symmetry, linear groups, and quadratic number fields in more detail than the text provided, and to shift the emphasis in group theory from permutation groups to matrix groups. Lattices, another recurring theme, appeared spontaneously. My hope was that the concrete material would interest the students and that it would make the abstractions more understandable, in short, that they could get farther by learning both at the
same time. This worked pretty well. It took me quite a while to decide what I wanted to put in, but I gradually handed out more notes and eventually began teaching from them without another text. This method produced a book which is, I think,somewhat different from existing ones. However, the problems I encountered while fitting the parts together caused me many headaches, so I can't recommend starting this way.
The main novel feature of the book is its increased emphasis on special topics.They tended to expand each time the sections were rewritten, because I noticed over the years that, with concrete mathematics in contrast to abstract concepts, students often prefer more to less. As a result, the ones mentioned above have become major parts of the book. There are also several unusual short subjects, such as the ToddCoxeter algorithm and the simplicity of PSL2.
In writing the book, I tried to follow these principles:
1. The main examples should precede the abstract definitions.
2. The book is not intended for a "service course," so technical points should be presented only if they are needled in the book.
3. All topics discussed should he important for the average mathematician.Though these principles may sound like motherhood and the flag, I found it useful to have them enunciated, and to keep in mind that "Do it the way you were taught"isn't one of them. They are, of course, violated here and there.
The table of contents gives a good idea of the subject matter, except that a first glance may lead you to believe that the book contains all of the standard material in a beginning algebra course, and more. Looking more closely, you will find that things have been pared down here and there to make space for the special topics. I used the above principles as a guide. Thus having the main examples in hand before proceeding to the abstract material allowed some abstractions to he treated more concisely. I was also able to shorten a few discussions by deferring them until the students have already overcome their inherent conceptual difficulties. The discussion of Peano's axioms in Chapter 10, for example, has been cut to two pages. Though
the treatment given there is very incomplete, my experience is that it suffices to give the students the flavor of the axiomatic development of integer arithmetic. A more extensive discussion would he required if it were placed earlier in the book, and the time required for this wouldn't be well spent. Sometimes the exercise of deferring material showed that it could be deferred forever——that it was not essential. This happened with dual spaces and multilinear algebra, for example, which wound up on the floor as a consequence of the second principle. With a few concepts, such as the minimal polynomial, I ended up believing that their main purpose in introductory algebra books has been to provide a convenient source of exercises.
The chapters are organized following the order in which I usually teach a course, with linear algebra, group theory, and geometry making up the first semester. Rings are first introduced in Chapter 10, though that chapter is logically independent of many earlier ones. I use this unusual arrangement because I want to emphasize the connections of algebra with geometry at the start, and because, overall, the material in the first chapters is the most important for people in other fields.
The drawback is that arithmetic is given short shrift. This is made up for in the later
chapters, which have a strong arithmetic slant. Geometry is brought back from time
to time in these later chapters, in the guise of lattices, symmetry, and algebraic geometry.
Michael Artin
December 1990
on the whole the harder labor.
Herman Weyl
This book began about 20 years ago in the form of supplementary notes for my algebra classes. I wanted to discuss some concrete topics such as symmetry, linear groups, and quadratic number fields in more detail than the text provided, and to shift the emphasis in group theory from permutation groups to matrix groups. Lattices, another recurring theme, appeared spontaneously. My hope was that the concrete material would interest the students and that it would make the abstractions more understandable, in short, that they could get farther by learning both at the
same time. This worked pretty well. It took me quite a while to decide what I wanted to put in, but I gradually handed out more notes and eventually began teaching from them without another text. This method produced a book which is, I think,somewhat different from existing ones. However, the problems I encountered while fitting the parts together caused me many headaches, so I can't recommend starting this way.
The main novel feature of the book is its increased emphasis on special topics.They tended to expand each time the sections were rewritten, because I noticed over the years that, with concrete mathematics in contrast to abstract concepts, students often prefer more to less. As a result, the ones mentioned above have become major parts of the book. There are also several unusual short subjects, such as the ToddCoxeter algorithm and the simplicity of PSL2.
In writing the book, I tried to follow these principles:
1. The main examples should precede the abstract definitions.
2. The book is not intended for a "service course," so technical points should be presented only if they are needled in the book.
3. All topics discussed should he important for the average mathematician.Though these principles may sound like motherhood and the flag, I found it useful to have them enunciated, and to keep in mind that "Do it the way you were taught"isn't one of them. They are, of course, violated here and there.
The table of contents gives a good idea of the subject matter, except that a first glance may lead you to believe that the book contains all of the standard material in a beginning algebra course, and more. Looking more closely, you will find that things have been pared down here and there to make space for the special topics. I used the above principles as a guide. Thus having the main examples in hand before proceeding to the abstract material allowed some abstractions to he treated more concisely. I was also able to shorten a few discussions by deferring them until the students have already overcome their inherent conceptual difficulties. The discussion of Peano's axioms in Chapter 10, for example, has been cut to two pages. Though
the treatment given there is very incomplete, my experience is that it suffices to give the students the flavor of the axiomatic development of integer arithmetic. A more extensive discussion would he required if it were placed earlier in the book, and the time required for this wouldn't be well spent. Sometimes the exercise of deferring material showed that it could be deferred forever——that it was not essential. This happened with dual spaces and multilinear algebra, for example, which wound up on the floor as a consequence of the second principle. With a few concepts, such as the minimal polynomial, I ended up believing that their main purpose in introductory algebra books has been to provide a convenient source of exercises.
The chapters are organized following the order in which I usually teach a course, with linear algebra, group theory, and geometry making up the first semester. Rings are first introduced in Chapter 10, though that chapter is logically independent of many earlier ones. I use this unusual arrangement because I want to emphasize the connections of algebra with geometry at the start, and because, overall, the material in the first chapters is the most important for people in other fields.
The drawback is that arithmetic is given short shrift. This is made up for in the later
chapters, which have a strong arithmetic slant. Geometry is brought back from time
to time in these later chapters, in the guise of lattices, symmetry, and algebraic geometry.
Michael Artin
December 1990
评论交流
共有52人开贴评论 93人参与评论 39人参与打分 查看
评价等级:







发表于:2004-11-29 10:54:00
这是一本能称之为great的代数书,这同时也是一本很有特色的代数书。自1965年Serge Lang的《Algebra》以来,本科和研究生层次的代数教材出了不少,但内容和架构不出Serge Lang的书的范围。这并不是说那些书都不好,而是Serge Lang的代数书确实是1960-1990着三十年来代数书的一个经典。但Michael Artin的这本代数跳出了Serge Lang的巢穴。Serge Lang的书以培养抽象化思维能力为基点,书中的内容大多从纯粹抽象代数的观点出发,结合数论中的一些方法,尽管把抽象代数的内容作了一个统一的抽象处理,但没有把代数同其他数学分支广泛联系起来,很容易给人代数是抽象的游戏的感觉。Michael Artin作为一个代数几何学家(偏向代数的背景)在他的这本书中则尽力强调代数同其他数学分支的联系,尤其是同拓扑以及代数几何的联系,书中的很多章节都对抽象的概念进行了直观地解释或者给出了形象的例子,使读者能看到一个个用抽象定义的概念背后的图形,使读者体会到代数在其他分支中的威力,所以可以说这本书是从1965年Serge Lang的大作以来的第二本真正的代数书,开一代代数教学风气之先。而且这对于一向缺少数学分支之间横向联系教学的风格中国各大学数学系,无疑是一剂良药。对于希望以后攻读代数的学生,这本书能开阔他们的视野(虽然Serge Lang的书也许更适合他们,但要成为一个优秀的数学家,开阔的视野是一个很好的开始)。对于其他分支的学生,这本书中的代数知识都是成为一个数学家所必须具备的基础知识,而且这本书应该会使长期处于“数学分析是一切大学数学的基础”论调下的中国学生体会到另一种风格的数学美(我一向以为在中国,数学分析被过分强调了,很多学生的思维被固化,就是这种过分强调的恶果)。
| 我要写评论 |
| 查看所有评论交流(共52条) |








点击看大图






加载中...

